Error: package architecture (arm) does not match system (armhf)
11 July 2016
I installed a beta version of a Debian package on my Raspberry Pi 3 and received the following error:
dpkg: error processing archive remote-syslog2_0.18_arm.deb (--install): package architecture (arm) does not match system (armhf) Errors were encountered while processing: remote-syslog2_0.18_arm.deb
The suggested solution was to add the
arm architecture as follows:
dpkg --add-architecture arm
and then re-run the install command:
dpkg -i remote-syslog2_0.18_arm.deb
I did so and the package installed and worked as expected. However, this made me wonder:
- What did the
dpkg --add-architecture armcommand do?
- What were the consequences of running that command?
After several hours of reading, experimenting and writing this blog post, I think I know. I’ll start by breaking the command down.
dpkg is a command line tool for managing Debian packages. To install a package, the
dpkg tool needs to recognize that package’s architecture. Supported architectures are in the
/var/lib/dpkg/arch file. The following commands display information about the architecture(s)
dpkg --print-architecturewill display the current machine architecture. There will always be one current machine architecture. It cannot be removed.
dpkg --print-foreign-architectureswill list any architectures that have been added to
dpkg. Foreign architectures can be added and removed.
dpkg -I package_name.debwill display information about a .deb archive. The architecture of a package will be listed in the ‘Architecture’ field.
In the above screenshot the
dpkg --print-foreign-architectures command returns nothing because a foreign architecture has not yet been added.
Architecture in this scenario refers to an Application Binary Interface. There are two ways to install a package that does not match the current architecture:
dpkg --add-architecture arch_name- adds the given architecture to the list of architectures
dpkgwill process. After running this command do an
apt-get updateto update the available package lists. If you get errors see the errors section below. Note: running the
add-architecturecommand does not alter the computer’s architecture. It only tells the
dpkgtool which architectures it will process.
dpkg --force architecture -i package_name.deb- installs a Debian package with no architecture or an architecture that does not match the machine’s architecture. The foreign architecture is not added to the list of architectures that
Application Binary Interface
arm is the name of the Debian ABI for the ARM architecture. ABI, or Application Binary Interface, is a low level interface. It defines how software interacts with each other on a given architecture. From Linux System Programming:
… an ABI defines the binary interface between two or more pieces of software on a particular architecture. It defines how an application interacts with itself, how an application interacts with the kernel, and how an application interacts with libraries. Whereas an API ensures source compatibility, an ABI ensures binary compatibility, guaranteeing that a piece of object code will function on any system with the same ABI, without requiring recompilation.
The ABI is intimately tied to the architecture; the vast majority of an ABI speaks of machine-specific concepts, such as particular registers or assembly instructions. Thus, each machine architecture has its own ABI on Linux. In fact, we tend to call a particular ABI by its machine name, such as Alpha, or x86-64. Thus, the ABI is a function of both the operating system (say, Linux) and the architecture (say, x86-64).
arm is the original Debian port of the arm-linux ABI. It is now considered obsolete and newer ports such as armel and armhf have replaced it.
armel is the default Debain port for the ARM architecture.
armhf is a port that uses the “hard” Floating Point Unit. This means a hardware unit, as opposed to software, performs floating point calculations.
First remove any packages that use the architecture. There are two options to remove the packages:
apt-get remove ".*:arm"- This will remove all
armpackages but will leave configuration files.
apt-get purge ".*:arm"- This will remove all
armpackages plus their configuration files.
Next, use the
dpkg --remove-architecture arch_name command to remove the architecture.
Note: the following error will occur if any packages of the given architecture exist:
dpkg: error: cannot remove architecture 'arm' currently in use by the database
The screenshot below shows the errors and results from removing the
After choosing ‘Y’ at the prompt, the package is removed. Now the
arm architecture can be removed successfully:
Errors from adding the new architecture
One of the questions I had was if there were any consequences from adding the
arm architecture. The answer is ‘yes’. I received the following error when I attempted to update my Raspberry Pi using the
sudo apt-get update command:
Error: Hit http://archive.raspberrypi.org jessie InRelease Hit http://mirrordirector.raspbian.org jessie InRelease W: Failed to fetch http://mirrordirector.raspbian.org/raspbian/dists/jessie/InRelease Unable to find expected entry 'main/binary-arm/Packages' in Release file (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file) W: Failed to fetch http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian/dists/jessie/InRelease Unable to find expected entry 'main/binary-arm/Packages' in Release file (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file) E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
This error occurred because
apt-get tried to get
arm packages that do not exist. To resolve this I specified it to only get
armhf packages. I did this by modifying the following two files:
In each file I added [arch=armhf] to the listing.
deb [ arch=armhf ] http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian/ jessie main ui
deb [arch=armhf] http://mirrordirector.raspbian.org/raspbian/ jessie main contrib non-free rpi
In the following screenshot the first file in the
diff command contains the modification I made and the second file is the original file.
I discovered one side effect from adding a new architecture, but are there any more? One possibility is the package may not work if it depends on specific architecture attributes. In my case the package worked, but others may not.
When faced with installing a package that uses a different architecture:
- First ask if the package can be compiled for the computer’s architecture. This is the preferred solution.
- If compiling for your architecture is not possible then first try force architecture.
- If that does not work then try add architecture.
Wow! I learned a lot! It is amazing what lies beneath one command.